mandragora: (Default)
Got into a discussion on a mailing list today re English language differences, particularly re 'gotten'. I maintained that it's not used in Britain but a couple of Brits chimed in to say that they use it.

All I can say is that according to the OED, the past participle of 'get' in British English is 'got', whereas in US English it's 'gotten'. And if it's good enough for the OED, it's good enough for me ::g::

Oh, and Websters refers to gotten as being 'obsolete' in Britain.

In my defence I cited the Harry Potter books, pointing out that you won't find a single 'gotten' in them, as they're written by a British writer and set in Britain. And indeed you won't, unless of course you're reading the Americanised version.

Snerk.

In 'Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone' (and why the US publishers felt the need to change the perfectly serviceable 'Philosopher's Stone' is beyond me) sure enough there are 'gottens' galore.

I found an online extract and spent some anally retentive minutes looking for differences between the original and bowdlerised, um, Americanised, version. Besides the transmutation of 'got' into 'gotten', I noted the following:
bobble hats: bonnets (which conjures up a rather hilarious image in my head)
roundabout: carousel
cooker: stove
motorbike: motorcycle
Sellotape: Scotch tape
Mummy: Mommy (spit! Really can't see any need whatsoever for this change)
cine camera: video camera ('cos there's such a huge difference between them...)
video recorder became (of course) VCR
hamburger bars: hamburger restaurants (Why? Can't believe even the most insular American child couldn't have worked that one out)
cinema: 'the movies'
holiday: vacation
fringe: bangs

Now all of these alterations were in just a couple of pages. the sheer amount of effort that must have gone into changing the whole book is mind boggling. Why? What was the point?
mandragora: (Default)
Am not, because friend who I was meant to be meeting slipped on some fallen leaves last night, fell and broke her shoulder. Ouch!

First thought after I'd finished initial commiserations was to enquire where accident happened. Was on public property, so leaves should've been swept up by local council. Oooh, sez I, you can sue the council, then.

Am such a lawyer.

Sigh.
mandragora: (Default)
Yesterday was not a good day.

It's not that I'm totally unsympathetic to the firefighters' demand for more money. But. Dammit, why when they go on strike does that result in the total shut down of the Piccadilly Line? Not to mention a greatly reduced service on the other tube lines.

I'm lucky, I can get a train into The City, and pick up the tube from there to my ultimate destination. Felt sorry for the poor sods further down the line, though, who had zero chance in actually getting onto the incredibly overcrowded train and were left standing bleakly on the rain-swept platform.

Yesterday, I had to get to court, as the trial I've been involved in recently was continuing. Arrived just in time to attend court when the trial actually resumed, courtesy of the firefighters' strike, instead of the pre-arranged earlier time to discuss matters with the client. Sigh.

As a litigator I'm used to trials, of course, but from a civil POV so I'm on a learning curve vis a vis criminal law. Emotions can run high. They certainly did yesterday. The trial concluded and the jury pronounced their verdict.

Guilty.

Seconds later, there were sounds of a disturbance from the dock where the Defendant, our client, was standing. The guard in the dock hit the panic button and sirens blared as several other guards piled into court and the police officer in court, who was the lead officer in the case, also leapt into the dock.

The Defendant was trying to strangle himself with his own tie.

Above him, in the public gallery, his mother and girlfriend screamed in horror and anguish.

The judge cleared the jury from the court room, as the guards mananged to subdue the Defendant, even as he cried out that he was innocent. Later, when we visited him in the cells he was still distressed but had calmed down somewhat. He's now on suicide watch.

Double sigh.

Wearily, I made my way back home, hampered by the fact that I couldn't take the straightforward route as the Piccadilly Line was up the creek. When I finally got home I discovered that I'd inadvertently managed to tape over my copy of the dS episode 'Victoria's Secret'. Trivial, admittedly, but still. Bugger.

Then checked my email and discovered that a close friend had had some very bad news concerning the loss of a contract that will seriously impact on her financially.

Wrote a LJ journal re all of the above and LJ ate it. Was too knackered to compose another entry last night, so left it until today.

Triple sigh.

Crappy day all round.
mandragora: (Default)
for whom the bell tolls.

I was attending court at Middlesex Guildhall this Remembrance Day. Middlesex Guildhall is in Parliament Square, opposite the Houses of Parliament. An announcement came over the court intercom that at 11am the court would observe 2 minutes silence in memory of those who died fighting in the wars of the past.

At 11am as everything fell silent in the court all that could be heard was Big Ben across the square chiming out the hour. A shiver crawled down my spine.

In Parliament Square itself, and particularly in Westminster Abbey, there was a sea of red poppies. At lunchtime as people hustled and bustled hither and yon many stopped to look and think for a moment in silence, even amongst the roar of the traffic.
mandragora: (Default)
I was in Homebase the other day, which had been totally revamped. I wandered upstairs to take a look at the furniture and noted that they had 'nightstands' for sale. What I want to know is, when did bedside tables become nightstands?

It was only a few years ago when I had to ask an American friend whose story I was betaing what a nightstand was. And now they're being sold in DIY outlets all over Britain.

We're becoming so used to Americanisms that it's becoming ever harder to spot them when we see them. Witness the very good Harry Potter story I read lately that had been betaed by at least one Brit. But she'd missed the 'gottens'. So used to reading them in US based fanfiction that she'd forgotten that gotten has been obsolete in Britain for a couple of hundred years or so, presumably. I must admit that it is a pet bug-bear of mine - any sentence structured to use 'gotten' just isn't British - we don't tend to use 'got', 'gotten' etc in the same way that Americans do.

Or at least we don't at present. I'm not taking any bets on the future.
mandragora: (Default)
So the other day arachne and Thermidor came round to my place to watch Season 2 Smallville vids, courtesy of Thermidor's other half who had sent them to her so that we poor, benighted Smallville-deprived slashers in the UK could revel in the slashiness that is CLex.

Arachne arrived bearing Cadbury's Flakes, which I promptly moved to put in the fridge. 'Good move,' sez Arachne, 'Cos we need the Flakes to be hard when we're watching Lex!' ::choke::

We started off with 'Heat'. It's been a while since I've seen episodes of a slashy series in the company of other fans, especially on a first viewing basis and I'd forgotten how much sheer fun it is.

We marvelled at the brevity of Mrs Luthor-to-be's dress - 'There's no way she'd be allowed to teach wearing that'. We giggled when Clark felt puberty stirring and set the room on fire - suggestive, much! We groaned at Clark's look of total disappointment when Lex ignored him in favour of Desiree. We choked at Clark and the scarecrow and squirmed at Jonathon trying to persuade Clark to, um, ejaculate. Chloe's line about Clark being immune to Desiree's charms had us squeeing. As for the Flaming Lex scene... ::grin:: But yeah, the episode was one big sex-fest and a hoot to boot. Sheer fun.

We then skipped straight to 'Red', the allure of Bad Clark proving irresistible. Now, I'd read all the spoilers, so knew something of what to expect, but for Thermidor and arachne it was, um, virgin territory ::grin::

Their reaction to Clark's, "Clark Kent and Lex Luthor. I like the sound of that." was just classic. Cue squealing, snorting, shrieks of, 'It's slash on a plate!' and general all round hilarity.

As for Clark. Yum. Really liked the $2,000 coat and loved the suit. Giggled like mad at the leather jacket and the sunglasses - yep, it's true what others have said, even when trying to act cool Clark's still a dork at heart.

But oh, later on he became seriously mean and actually rather scary. Which was also very sexy, in a 'I love a good villain' type of way. As others have said before me, and rather better too, Clark has so much power that should be choose to use it for his own ends he would be almost unstoppable. Shiver.

In fact, in that scenario the only person I can think of who would be both clever enough and ruthless enough to stop him is Future Lex. Makes some of the FutureFic look rather prescient.

As for the Episode Where Pete Finds Out (am too lazy to go look up it's name), it had it's good points (and that touch of Lionel's was Bad, Bad, Bad) but paled somewhat in comparison to the squeefests that were 'Heat' and 'Red'.

But such great fun. Can't wait for the next tape.
mandragora: (Default)
a radiator key around when you need it?

I've got loads of the damn things, but can I find even a measly one? Nope.

Sigh. Homebase tomorrow it is.
mandragora: (Default)
Justin Timberlake (of Nsync fame) has just seen his new solo single go straight into the UK charts at No 2. No mean achievement, considering that apparently we in the UK don't know who Nsync is. Hmmm, or do we?

I'll admit that I don't, but then my interest in boybands is minimal at best. I like Robbie Williams and cheerfully buy his records, but Take That? I Think Not. But yeah, Justin. I thought the record was pretty good, in a Michael Jackson type of way and it looks like the boy done got talent. Really can't see the squee factor, though. He seems to be reasonably pretty, but is just too young for me. My Smallville addiction notwithstanding.

But Clark is (a) not really 15/16 (being played by a 25 year old) and (b) destined for Lex (who is also Not Really 21), and not for me (although the Nsync slashers are, of course, not thinking about Justin in For Me terms either). So, yeah, Justin Timberlake is talented but I'm not feeling the lurve.

And talking of Smallville, Lex is apparently going to have a recurring love interest in the form of a very attractive doctor. I'm looking forward to seeing how the storyline pans out and am doing my best to ignore the predictably tiresome bewailing and gnashing of teeth by a certain section of fandom.

How dare TPTB! They know that Clark is Lex's twue-luv and how dare some horrible, icky woman get between our BSOs. Women! Can't trust them, they're all horrible bitches. And het-sex - yuck, yuck, yuck. Squick!

Sigh. All I can say to those who refuse to believe that there is misogny in slashdom is that I have seen comments similar to the above pasted time and time and time again. In fandom after fandom after fandom.

Yeah, I love my slash. But I'm quite prepared to love the het too (John/Aeryn, Buffy/Spike, drool). And even if I wasn't, I wouldn't be bitching about it.
mandragora: (Default)
There are many members of the English & Welsh judiciary who are the epitome of kindness and courtesy. Unfortunately, the judge I appeared before this morning wasn't.

I was sitting in a packed court-room waiting for the first of the couple of cases I was dealing with to be called when, disaster! A mobile phone went off.

Everyone - counsel, solicitors, police officers, defendants - dived for their briefcases/jacket pockets/handbags etc to check that it wasn't them. It wasn't. It was me.

Sigh.

I could've sworn that my mobile was off. Just as well I didn't swear to it, as I'd have been committing perjury. Double sigh.

Cue hasty exit on my part complete with ringing phone, which was in the depths of my bag which meant that I was unable to reach in and swiftly delete the call. As I dived for the door, the judge yelled after me to not to bother come back.

He'd banned me from the court.

Luckily, a couple of colleagues were in court and were able to take over my cases, so the clients were represented.

As everyone who'd been in court trickled out as their cases were dealt with, they all stopped to commiserate - it was definitely a case of there but for the grace of God and all that.

It wasn't just the fact that my mobile had gone off, it was also the fact that it had happened in front of this particular judge, who is, hmm, well let's just say, 'not popular' and leave it at that. One lawyer commented that she'd had a three week trial in front of this judge at the end of which she felt like slitting her wrists. Several commented that they really didn't think the 'offence' warranted being banned.

Mind you, the clerk of the court rather snottily commented to me later that if it happened again I could be done for contempt (because, of course, in the scheme of things leaving one's mobile on is such a heinous offence). Several lawyers said that I was, in fact, lucky that I hadn't been banged up in the cells for the rest of the day (I think they were joking, but who knows with this judge?).

Still, it could have been worse. Apparently, there is a judge who confiscates mobiles if they go off in his court and never gives them back. This is of dubious legality, but what are you gonna do? Apply for judicial review because he won't give your mobile back and incur the opprobrium of the Court of Appeal? I think not.

A colleague was in court the other day in front of another judge when a mobile starting ringing. The judge went apeshit, yelling at everyone in court that when he found out who's it was... Eventually, everyone twigged to the fact that the sound was coming from somewhere suspiciously close to the judge. Yep. It was the judge's own phone that was going off. Proof that no one is infallible.

As for me, well now my card is well and truly marked where this particular judge is concerned. But all I have to do is to decline to take on any cases in front of him for the next twenty years or so and I should be home free...
mandragora: (Default)
For reasons that do not need exploring at this juncture, I caught an episode of Charlie's Angels on TV this afternoon. It was an ep with Cheryl Ladd, rather than Farrah Fawcett. But I don't think Farah would have made any difference.

It was terrible.

The plot was risible - I spotted the red herring and the villain immediately they came on screen. It involved the 'Angels' supposedly going undercover as call girls (ooh, missus), but all this involved was them schmoozing round the pool with some 'real' call girls and then 2 seconds later admitting that, actually, they weren't prostitutes at all, but really were private detectives.

Snort.

Oh yeah, Cheryl posed as a hooker and went to meet the client of one of the dead girls on his luxury yacht ::rolls eyes:: but all he wanted to do was talk about why his wife didn't understand him - after making Cheryl change into a rather fetching bikini, complete with high heels even though she'd been wearing trainers when she arrived. Gotta pander to the male demographic, of course.

The Angels came off as totally incompetent, for not spotting the villain immediately, who was so obvious he should have had 'villain' tattooed across his forehead. Plus, they had no idea how to defend themselves, even though they were supposedly trained police officers. Yeah, right.

What's scary is that way back when, when I was young(er) and more naive, I used to actually like Charlie's Angels. What was I thinking?

I know it's a product of its time, but... ::shudder::
mandragora: (Default)
Due to a friend's illness I ended up staying in last night and settled down to see if there was anything worth watching on the telly. Despite having about 70 channels to choose from pickings looked to be slim. However Channel 4 came to my rescue.

First up was a documentary called The Model Empire which looked at why the Roman Empire was so successful and compared Ancient Rome's domination in the past to that of America today. The point the documentary was making was that the Roman Empire succeeded by making the conquered nations want to be Roman. If the Romans had depended solely on military might, their Empire would not have lasted for almost a thousand years.

In a similar fashion, the US exports its culture world wide, through TV, movies, the internet and the ubiquitous fast-food - Coca Cola and McDonalds are now pretty much everywhere. Although the US maintains a military presence in well over a 100 countries worldwide it does not, and cannot, rely solely on military might to maintain its dominance, even though it has the best armed and equipped military force in the world. Rather like the Romans in their day.

The Romans were bewildered when any nation attempted to reject all that Rome had to offer. Sometimes client nations rose up in revolt and slaughtered any Romans living in their midst - there was a massacre of 80,000 Roman citizens living in Italy, for example. The Romans could not comprehend why anyone hated them so, because surely what they had to offer was worthwhile and progressive? The programme pointed out the similarity of Rome's reaction to that of the US following the horrors of September 11 last year.

The pace of modern life makes it unlikely that America will be able to maintain its dominance for as long as the Roman Empire lasted, (modern empires are a bitch to maintain - just ask the British) and the programme made the point that America has to make some hard decisions about its role in the world in the next decade or so, but the parallels made for very interesting viewing.

Later, there was one of the most chilling TV programmes I've ever seen. It was called The Pact. In July 2000, the bodies of four women were discovered lying in a house in Dublin. They had all died of starvation.

Three of the bodies were found in the lounge, each huddled in blankets. The other was in the kitchen, collapsed across a pile of rubbish bags, much of which consisted of carefully shredded documentation - the women apparently went to some pains to ensure that their lives remained as private as possible.

The women were related to one another, one was the aunt of the other three, who were all sisters, and two of whom were twins. The aunt had come to live with the sisters' family at the twins' birth in order to help the family out and had ended up in effect raising the twins and their younger sister while the parents were busy working to support the family. There were five girls in all, but the oldest two sisters were raised by their parents, not their aunt. According to old school friends the three younger sisters kept very much to themselves, although they were always polite and well spoken.

The aunt and the sisters lived at home, working in the family hardware shop, until the sisters were all in their late twenties/early thirties. They then left home to go and live with their aunt in a house in the suburbs of Dublin by the sea. They lived there for twenty years, but again they kept very much to themselves.

However, the landlord of the house they were living in evicted them for non-payment of rent and they were forced to relocate in a much less salubrious part of Dublin. In the new house they were even more rarely seen than in the old, keeping all the curtains drawn at all times and only venturing out to shop for food or attend church, making sure that they didn't go to the local church where they might be forced to interact with their neighbours. They also cut off contact with their relatives, including their two older sisters.

At some point the women made a decision - a pact - to die, in effect to commit suicide. This despite the fact that they were all fervent Catholics. It was meticulously planned. On 31 March the aunt and one of the sisters took their last trip outside the house, as testified by the taxi driver who drove them back home from central Dublin. From receipts found in the house this was the last time they bought anything and therefore ventured outside.

They then sealed themselves up in the house and never left it again.

It took them a long time to die. Although they stopped eating they took fluids, thus prolonging how long it would take until the end. It takes the human body between thirty to sixty days to die of starvation if liquids continue to be drunk. The aunt, who was the oldest and was in her eighties, was the first to go. She actually died of pneumonia brought on by starvation. One of the twins followed her a couple of days later. The remaining sisters lasted another two weeks, one dying a day or so before the other. The last to die was the sister whose body was in the kitchen.

The horror of this is almost beyond words. The women condemned themselves to an extremely cruel and protracted death - dying of starvation is one of the worst ways to die as the body in effect eats itself, consumes its own organs, in a desperate attempt to sustain life.

It appears that one of the twins had second thoughts, as a letter addressed to her fellow twin was found underneath the mattress on which her body lay. In it, she pleaded with her sister to reconsider, writing movingly of how terrible their suffering was. The letter was apparently written over a period of days and the sister's handwriting deteriorated considerably as the effects of starvation ever worsened, However, she didn't actually hand it to her sister and died a few days after the last entry.

I am trying to imagine what it must have been like for the remaining two sisters in the last couple of weeks of their lives, lying beside the bodies of their sister and aunt. I cannot comprehend how horrible it must have been.

People have suffered and died in a similar fashion since the human race began. However, this was usually due to circumstances beyond their control, or for a 'cause', such as the IRA hunger strikers. In the case of the latter, their protest took on a life of its own. The eyes of the world were on them, they were receiving great publicity for the IRA's aims etc and that would put the onus on them to continue on with their hunger strike until the very end. But this was the aunt and sisters' choice. They could have stopped at any time, but didn't. This choice and the fact that they did not stop I cannot comprehend.

They believed that they were casting off their fleshy shells and would ascend to heaven, to the spirit realm. But even so, how tragic that they thought that life had nothing to offer them. Worse, that they chose just about the most cruel method possible by which to die. Slitting their wrists would have been much quicker and less painful.

Photographs of the women show that the sisters were all very pretty women, who could have easily had lovers and friends and lived full lives. The aunt was a handsome determined-looking woman, who presumably again could have lived and enjoyed life. Maybe she did - after all she was old when she died, unlike the middle-aged sisters.

Tragically, it seems that the last sister to die was attempting to escape her tomb when she collapsed and died. The Garda believe that she was trying to get hold of the key to the locked back door in the kitchen, but was too weak and fell onto the rubbish bags.

The bodies were not found until two months after the last sister died. The landlord came round to see why the rent hadn't been paid, and forced entry when there was no response to his hails.

I have seldom seen anything so disturbing on television. It makes the usual horror movie look suitably laughable. Because this was real.
mandragora: (Default)
Finally I've got round to getting the stuff that was put into storage when I went to Gibraltar for a couple of years. I've only been back for...::winces:: two years now, so am demonstrating stunning efficiency.

Thing is, I didn't actually know what was in the boxes - I got my parents to pack everything that was in the spare bedroom up for me while I was actually in Gib and after I'd made the decision to rent out my place to someone I trusted ::waves to Temaris::.

It turned out to be an interesting exercise. There were about 20 boxes or so in storage. Of those, 2 or 3 were stuffed full of papers. The other boxes were filled with books. Lots and lots of books. I have so many books (I calculate that I've got between 3-4,000 scattered at various places, including my place and assorted relatives) that I simply do not have enough room for them. Despite some artful whining my long suffering relatives have all flatly refused to house any more of them. Sigh.

So, I have to get rid of some of them. Which is really, really hard. However, I have now sorted them into a pile to keep and a pile to go. I haven't yet decided which charity will benefit from the receipt of them, but am veering towards whichever one will come and collect. My back hurts from loading and unloading the car today with the stuff I've taken out of storage and I really don't fancy loading and unloading the car with six large boxes full of books, trying to find somewhere to park that won't attract a parking ticket (almost impossible) and laboriously staggering into one of the local charity shops with one box at a time.

But it's no surprise that the final count is six boxes to charity compared with ten boxes to keep. Now all I have to do is get them into the loft...
mandragora: (Default)
I have some stuff that I need to get rid of, which adds up to quite a large amount. Now, I could simply leave it outside for the binmen to take, but most of it is recyclable and I want to do my bit for the environment, so I decide that I'll take it to the nearest recycling centre.

This turns out to be ever so slightly difficult. For more moanings go here )
mandragora: (Default)
I appreciate that this is the eternal teenage cry and that I should be well past this, but I'm feeling self-pitying here.

Today I went into town to meet fellow slasher J for lunch. Before meeting up I decided to visit bookshops Forbidden Planet and Murder One. At some point whilst walking along either New Oxford St and Charing Cross Rd some scumbag nicked my purse. Sigh.

Whoever it was got behind me, unzipped my backpack and took out my purse. I'd just been to the bank, too. I found out that the purse was gone when I was about to pay for some drinks for J and myself, got that sinking feeling when I realised that my backpack was unzipped, because I knew I'd done it up.

I think it happened whilst I was waiting for the traffic lights to change so I could cross over the junction. A bloke stood too close behind me, even though there was a gap at the side of me and it would have made more sense for him to stand there. I moved away from him, but (if it was him) probably not soon enough.

Now all this is bad enough, but, I was also mugged a few months ago. That was the full works, gang of 8 surrounding me when I was walking home from the train station after dark. I fought back (well, dammit, it was my stuff they were stealing!) but lost - not surprising considering the odds. Then, I lost my entire bag not just the purse.

But. Twice in one year. What is happening to this country?

I've never thought of myself as the victim type. Yes, I'm small but I walk fast and try to look confident, yet I've been hit on twice in almost as many months now. I'm fairly resilient, so haven't suffered any lasting effects from the mugging and still walk along the footpath where it happened on my way to and from work. However, I'm beginning to gain an inkling of why some people are living their lives in fear.

I decided to report the latest theft to the police and that was...interesting. When I was mugged as soon as I got home I reported it to the police and they arrived at my place within 20 minutes, which is pretty good going. I thought that they dealt with the situation as well as they could, recognising that the chance of catching the perpetrators was pretty much zero.

This time, obviously the situation was less serious but even so the response was less than satisfactory. I sat with J in a bookshop cafe and used my mobile to call directory enquiries for the relevant police station number. Clearly, the situation didn't warrant calling 999, so I wasn't about the clog up the emergency lines.

Directory enquiries attempted to give me the number of the City Police. I tried to explain that the City has a different police force from the rest of London, but the operator remained clueless. She quoted me a number over the phone that turned out to be some photocopying place and texted me the City Police's number. Sigh.

So, I rang the City Police in the hope they could give me the right number. They provided me with the number for West End Central police station, however when I rang them they directed me to another number in order to report the theft. When I rang that, there was a recorded message only suggesting that the best way to report it was online to the relevant police website, or leave a message and they'd get back to me. Fat lot of good that was.

When I got home I went online and recorded the theft, on the basis that I may as well add to the soaring crime statistics. I'm all for efficient use of the internet by public bodies etc, but sometimes you want a human being on the other end of the line. And this was one of those times.

That pickpockets are operating in Central London at present is well known - there was even an announcement to that effect on the tube this morning. But I didn't think they'd get me, thought I was street savvy enough not to be caught out. Clearly I was wrong.

As for the gangs of pickpockets, word is the latest are from Portugal and Romania and that they're sophisticated operators. The Romanians are easy to deport, the Portuguese, as EU citizens, less so. God forbid that I should ever have sympathy for the knee-jerk reactionary anti-immigration people (immigration as a whole benefits the population) and I do have sympathy for people from less wealthy countries. But. Don't you fucking come over here and steal from anyone who happens to be here. If you do, you deserve to be deported pronto.

Should also mention that the vast majority of Romanian or Portuguese citizens visiting or living in the UK are, of course, honest, law abiding people.

And on the plus side, lunch with J was very nice indeed. She was telling me about some of the latest official Trek novels, by LA Graf that sound very interesting and, as they're by LA Graf are heavy on the Sulu and Chekov interest - which I like. I'm looking forward to reading them.
mandragora: (Default)
Once a year my nephews spend a week staying with their grandparents, without Mum and Dad. Once a year my mother begs me to come and stay at my parents' place in order to assist in entertaining said nephews. So far, I've always taken pity on her and agreed. This year was no exception.

Is it just me, or are boys harder to deal with than girls?

Anyway, amongst the other entertainment this year we took them to a theme park called The American Adventure. It was full of faux American culture - fake saloons, diners, bars etc. And, of course, the rides. The advantage of me going along is that, as a person who *loves* going on rides, the bigger and most stomach churning the better (what can I say, I'm an adrenaline junkie), I would happily get on all the rides with the kids so my beleaguered parents wouldn't have to. Some of the rides were actually pretty good, The Missile, for example, which was a roller coaster which hit 60mph at some points and looped the loop a few times both forwards and backwards engendered a genuine thrill. We rode that one a few times. The American Adventure isn't as good as Alton Towers, of course, but is worth a visit.

Anyway, we decided to get on a ride called The Runaway Train. The seats were such that there were 4 people to a carriage, divided into 2 sets of 2 seats. The seats weren't molded, though, and you could easily slide across from one to the other. The kids got onto the one set of seats and I sat in front of them, beside a Frenchwoman. The ride wasn't sufficiently violent that you really needed to be strapped in, not like The Missile, for example, where each person had an individual bar that can down around their body. In th case of the Runaway Train, the safety bar was made of metal and simply came down across both people in each seat.

So, we set off on the ride and despite it looking quite gentle from the ground it was actually pretty good. The track rolled up and down and several times twisted quite violently to one side or another. The Frenchwoman and I spent some time apologising to one another when the carriage angled at such a way as to send one of us sliding over - forcefully - into the other as the train twisted and turned it's way round the track. Several times it was at quite a severe angle. Then it was over, as we approached the end point, back to where we'd started. Only it wasn't. The train kept going.

That's unusual, I thought to myself, letting us go round the track twice. I was right, it was unusual; in fact the train had been meant to stop and now really was running away!

There were a few exclamations from the passengers, but no one was panicking as we weren't certain whether this was meant to happen or not, and then the train jerked to a halt, and reversed. We finally stopped at a point where there was a wooden platform, high up on stilts, with a ladder up from the ground to the platform. Trouble was, the track at this point was at a rather sever angle and I was at the top of the seat. I grasped frantically at the side of the carriage and braced my feet to avoid sliding inexorably on top of the hapless Frenchwoman who was sharing the seat. I was sweating as I braced myself hard. If I'd been in a seat with someone I knew I'd have thought the hell with it and let myself slide on top of the other person. But this was a stranger and well, to just let myself go would have been awfully rude. Hmm, I can be so British at times!

Eventually, the passengers realised that we weren't going to move at any time soon and several started to wriggle out from under the safety bar, which was still locked in place, onto the wooden platform and down the ladder. As soon as the, thankfully, slim Frenchwoman clambered out of the seat I was up and out, onto the platform and shaking my arms, which had been bearing the strain, ruefully. I noted that some poor hapless large people were well and truly trapped, not able to wriggle out from under the safety bar but couldn't stop to see if I could help in any way as I had to chase after my nephews who were already down the ladder. We wended our way around the track, which was raised high above our heads, until we came to the exit and leaped to the ground, laughing as we did so. The Runaway Train had definitely lived up to its name.
mandragora: (Default)
It's too bleedin' hot! That's the trouble with us Brits, we're never happy weatherwise. One minute we're whinging about the rain and then when we actually do get some good weather, we complain about the heat. Never satisfied.Read more of my thoughts on tourists this year. )
mandragora: (Default)
I was just reading this entry in arachne's journal regarding a programme on celebrity plastic surgery. And that got me thinking about the celebrity cult that seems to be reaching epidemic proportions at present and the what appears to be sudden popularity of RPS. I'm thinking that the two are connected.

Read more... )
mandragora: (Default)
Just remembered that I intended to credit the artist whose work I used for my LJ icon.

She's called Gini Mcgee, the work is entitled, "Ogle" and was created in 2001.

It's a pen and ink drawing, size 8 inches by 8 inches and the original is for sale. For more information go here
mandragora: (Default)
First post, having finally succumbed to LJ. After much prompting by arachne!

Question is, now that I've got one what do I do with it?

This afternoon we actually experienced pretty decent weather. Makes a nice change from the torrential downpour causing mass flooding, it being the height of summer and all that.

So, I went for a walk in the park. One thing that I love about living in London is that you're never far from a park. The city is riddled with them, a necessary adjunct to urban living. My local park really isn't very big, it's definitely not one of the Great Parks, catering as it does to a strictly-suburban-and-proud-of-it part of North London but nonetheless is both pretty and popular with the residents.

I drifted past the children's playground filled with parents keeping a sleepy eye on their offspring. There were at least 3 football matches going on, definitely amateur, set up with a couple of jumpers for goalposts and no-one was wearing football boots - judging from the amount of slipping and sliding going on - but there was still some rather nifty footwork. I was impressed.

I checked out the queue for the ice-cream van as I walked past the crazy golf course - only open in the summer, of course. Today, the Friern Barnet fair had come to call; there was the tinny tinkle of the Merry-go-round and the hum of the waltzers overlaid with the tonal shrieks of the riders. Plus the sickly-sweet smell of candyfloss. Only a small fair, it was rather charming.

Back I walked, first past the boating lake followed by several ornamental lakes and round a rather fierce swan that spread its wings and hissed at me as I strolled along. I glared back. My goal was the salsa music I could hear playing in the distance. Was it...? Yes, a live band! In the park on a sunny Sunday afternoon. Oh joy.

They were good. At least I thought so and so did the rest of the audience based on the amount of dancing going on. Some of it was typically British, rather self-conscious and ever-so-slightly awkward. Others had got rhythm. And how.

There are times when living in London is frustrating as hell, bad transport, air and rushing crowds uncaring of anything so basic as good manners. But then I decide to take a stroll in my local park one afternoon and come across not only a fair but also a live band. And then I remember why I love this city.
Page generated 20 March 2026 07:17
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios