Prompted by today's news that apparently all visitors to the US will shortly have to submit to having their fingerprints and mugshot taken upon entry to the US's fair *cough* shores.
Oh sure, the US is hitting the poor and non-white countries first (racist? Much!). But apparently the exempted countries from this outrageous invasion of civil liberties will lose their exemption by the end of 2004.
And, if so, bye bye US. I won't be visiting you any more.
This saddens me more than I can say. I've been to the US several times from my first visit in 1981 to my most recent last October. And it now looks like it may well be my last.
No more fannish cons in the US. No more (and this saddens me deeply) visits to friends I've made there. But, please, do come to Europe, where we don't make you have you fucking fingerprints taken!
But. Jesus. To photograph and fingerprint everyone who visits the country. What is this? The Stalinist Soviet Union mark II?
ETA: I'd be pretty reluctant to visit the US even if the exempted countries remain free from the mugshots and fingerprints. Because to target all citizens of any country in this way is utterly abhorrent. Shame on you home of the 'free', shame on you. Shame on your fucking Government, anyway.
Oh sure, the US is hitting the poor and non-white countries first (racist? Much!). But apparently the exempted countries from this outrageous invasion of civil liberties will lose their exemption by the end of 2004.
And, if so, bye bye US. I won't be visiting you any more.
This saddens me more than I can say. I've been to the US several times from my first visit in 1981 to my most recent last October. And it now looks like it may well be my last.
No more fannish cons in the US. No more (and this saddens me deeply) visits to friends I've made there. But, please, do come to Europe, where we don't make you have you fucking fingerprints taken!
But. Jesus. To photograph and fingerprint everyone who visits the country. What is this? The Stalinist Soviet Union mark II?
ETA: I'd be pretty reluctant to visit the US even if the exempted countries remain free from the mugshots and fingerprints. Because to target all citizens of any country in this way is utterly abhorrent. Shame on you home of the 'free', shame on you. Shame on your fucking Government, anyway.
no subject
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 07:44 (UTC)no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 07:22 (UTC)When I crossed from Canada to the US by car - in a car driven by a Canadian citizen - I was asked for my passport, but the driver took it from me and passed it to the officer in the cubbyhole, who never actually got a look at me to see if I corresponded in any way to my photo.
Are they seriously planning to set up these mugshot/fingerprint deals at every road that crosses from Canada into the US? Because if not, I can see that it would still be possible - if necessary - to visit the US by getting a direct flight to Canada, then getting a lift in a car driven by a Canadian citizen down into the US via a quiet road.
I can't imagine that they're seriously planning extensive border controls on the US/Canada roads, because unless they're also planning minefields/barbed wire etc, there is a vast deal of border across which anyone can simply walk, assuming minimal (and I do mean minimal) woodcraft.
Of course, doing pointless stuff to make it look as if they're doing a lot when in fact they're doing nothing is perfectly typical of the Bush government, so it's possible they're planning to institute fingerprint/mugshot stops at the US/Canada border...
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 07:40 (UTC)Good point. According to the Beeb they're going to institute it at 50 border posts later on in the year, so it seems likely.
But as you wrote, without an actual, physical border between the US and Canada the easy way for terrorists to enter would be via Canada.
Thanks for the info on your post as to the year of implementation being 2005. I renewed my passport in 2003, so I guess I won't be biometrically 'got' until 2013. Can't really renew it next year, as I won't be able to use any of the reasons for renewing such as a changed appearance.
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 07:36 (UTC)I admit to not really caring about the shot/prints since I had mine taken and kept since the age of 16, but what is really pissing me off is the whole idea behind it. But then again I never had any chances of getting a visa to go there anyway LOL
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 07:43 (UTC)Gotta remember that I come from a country that doesn't even like identity cards, hence the outrage *g*. But yes, it's the principle that's pissing me off.
I can't think of any reason why you shouldn't be given a visa. When I first visited it was still necessary to have a visa if you were a UK national, so I applied and got one... for life. It's never been revoked and still applies so far as I'm aware and I was a penurious student at the time.
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 08:36 (UTC)Of course, if you try to explain this to the oik behind the counter who's just cancelled your visa with absolutely no warning or questioning, they tend to call the police.
Like you, I'm not planning on going to the USA any time soon. This is even more irritating because my father lives in the BVI and getting there without going through the USA is painful.
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 08:51 (UTC)I must admit that the last few times I've visited the US I've relied on the visa waiver because the visa is in a passport that contains a photo taken when I was 13. As I've changed (just a tad *g*) since then I wasn't certain about proudly presenting the visa for inspection.
As for visiting the BVI without passing through the US... Ouch! I'm not certain I'd be that public spirited in the circumstances.
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 07:41 (UTC)It just gets worse here everyday. I wish I could move.
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 07:46 (UTC)I do too. Except that now, more than ever, your country needs you. Not the paranoid, rightwing, inward looking thing that it's becoming. But the real US, which is full of warm, generous, hospitable people. Like you.
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 09:18 (UTC)And considering how we've got a govt that thinks it is perfectly ok to take children away from asylum seekers as a negotiating tool, my humble opinion on the state of the world - mad!
Happy New Year, by the way! - hope you had a good break :)
no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 10:59 (UTC)I know, it's scary. The only comfort is that I can't somehow see any of our present politicians going quite as far as those in the US. Although Blair is a true believer - genuinely believes that he's doing the right thing. Last time we had one of those was in the Thatcher years. Hmm, maybe I should sign up for Prozac right away.
And a Happy New Year to you, too. I'll have to organise a get together that you Will Come Too soon ;)
no subject
Date: 6 January 2004 07:45 (UTC)no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 09:29 (UTC)no subject
Date: 5 January 2004 11:00 (UTC)Brazil, not just brilliant at kicking footballs...