It's been a long time since I actually finished something. Most of my efforts in recent years have fizzled out, when I've been too overwhelmed by RL circumstances to finish them. Or, I've just lost interest (temporarily, although I think that Smallville story is gone for good -- I can barely bring myself to watch the show any more) in finishing them at present.
So, imagine how glad I am to have finished something. Even if it is crack!fic! of the veriest cracked nature...
Announcing my first Stargate Atlantis story, written for the
sga_flashfic Harlequin Challenge.
Pairing: McKay/Sheppard
Genre: Slash
Rating: Explicit
Story summary: Atlantis needs Prince Rodney back.
Part One can be read here.
Part Two is here.
So, imagine how glad I am to have finished something. Even if it is crack!fic! of the veriest cracked nature...
Announcing my first Stargate Atlantis story, written for the
Pairing: McKay/Sheppard
Genre: Slash
Rating: Explicit
Story summary: Atlantis needs Prince Rodney back.
Part One can be read here.
Part Two is here.
no subject
Date: 10 September 2005 14:17 (UTC)no subject
Date: 10 September 2005 14:41 (UTC)On another note - you are going to Connotations, aren't you? Very much looking forward to seeing you there - and as you might recall, I'll be in London with
no subject
Date: 10 September 2005 15:00 (UTC)As for the Pros fic... Erm, I don't actually have anything on the go atm. But Pros is one of those fandoms for me which I think will last. It has done for at least 5 years now, so I think it's a keeper. It's just at present I'm madly in love with SGA and there isn't room for writing anything else. But I know from past experience that this won't last and I'll go back to the old favourites at that point.
I am definitely going to Connotations and am looking forward to seeing as much as possible of you both at the con and afterwards. Yay!
no subject
Date: 10 September 2005 15:15 (UTC)no subject
Date: 10 September 2005 15:57 (UTC)I am enormously flattered that you want to read it.
no subject
Date: 10 September 2005 20:01 (UTC)Liked it, for all it's crack-ness, even with the hole you could throw a dog through. (when can I not find something to criticise?)
Now, that you're all limbered up, so to speak, please exercise yourself on the epic.
no subject
Date: 10 September 2005 20:16 (UTC)Only one plot hole? *blinks at filenotch*
Glad that you liked it, despite the cracked premise, and I am continuing to write the epic and will be asking you to check the science (seeing as you were
madkind enough to offer) in due course. Mind you, I'm only up to page 75 atm, so there's a way to go...no subject
Date: 10 September 2005 22:51 (UTC)no subject
Date: 11 September 2005 01:41 (UTC)Only one big enough to throw a dog through.
No, really, it was cute.
You can hit me with the epic at any point if you don't want to wait to complete it to find out where the canine-sized holes are. *blinks at mandragora*
no subject
Date: 12 September 2005 18:45 (UTC)no subject
Date: 12 September 2005 18:46 (UTC)no subject
Date: 12 September 2005 19:07 (UTC)Many thanks.
no subject
Date: 13 September 2005 00:22 (UTC)no subject
Date: 13 September 2005 16:25 (UTC)And I am such a sucker for this challenge! Your story was just perfect for it. You managed to make it true to canon so cleverly, and yet it was such crackfic.
no subject
Date: 13 September 2005 18:29 (UTC)Writing crackfic? Me? *bg* I wound up Temaris by suggesting that I thought it could be an episode. There was a loooong silence on the other end of the phone, whilst she thought about how to break it to me gently. Ah, bless.
And yes, it was total crackfic!
no subject
Date: 13 September 2005 18:31 (UTC)I must admit the thought of John as a betrayed virgin was too much fun not to play with, but you're absolutely right. The whole thing is ludicrous.
no subject
Date: 13 September 2005 18:34 (UTC)no subject
Date: 13 September 2005 19:04 (UTC)princessconsort, though.no subject
Date: 13 September 2005 19:11 (UTC)no subject
Date: 13 September 2005 21:32 (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 September 2005 20:15 (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 October 2006 16:13 (UTC)no subject
Date: 10 October 2006 14:52 (UTC)